* B. Include an assessment to verify compliance in the next iteration. This option may be too late, as the project may already be in violation of the new regulation by continuing the testing phase without making any adjustments. The project manager should not wait for the next iteration to assess the compliance, but rather initiate a change request as soon as possible to avoid any legal or ethical issues.
* C. Conduct an iteration review to address the new regulation. This option may not be sufficient, as an iteration review is a meeting to inspect the work done in an iteration and obtain feedback from the stakeholders2. An iteration review may not be the appropriate forum to address the new regulation, as it may require more analysis, discussion, and approval from the CCB. The project manager should not rely on the iteration review alone to address the new regulation, but rather submit a change request to formally document and communicate the change.
* D. Start the tests over, adapting the trials to the new regulation. This option may be wasteful, as it may disregard the work done and the feedback obtained in the previous iterations. The project manager should not start the tests over without following the change management process, as it may create confusion, inconsistency, and conflict among the project team and stakeholders. The project manager should not make any changes to the project without obtaining the necessary approval from the CCB.
I hope this information helps you with your query. However, I suggest that you consult the official PMP and PBA reference materials and guides for more accurate and reliable information. Thank you for using Bing.
References:
1: Perform Integrated Change Control 2: Iteration Review