Explanation
The solution development team is appearing to change the prioritization of the requirements based on overstated complexity of the project work. This means that they are exaggerating the difficulty and effort involved in implementing a certain portion of the requirements, in order to lower their priority or avoid doing them altogether. This may indicate that the team does not want to implement those requirements for some reason, such as lack of interest, skills, resources, or alignment with the solution vision. This may also result in a loss of trust and collaboration between the business analyst and the solution development team, and a compromise of the quality and value of the solution.
The other options are not correct. A. Changing the prioritization of the requirements based on the past project is not what the solution development team is appearing to do, as they are insisting that this is a different type of requirements than the previous project. C. Getting the requirements removed from the project scope is not what the solution development team is appearing to do, as they are not explicitly asking for that, but rather expressing the difficulty of the requirements. D. Having the business analyst report the difficulty of the project work to the project customer is not what the solution development team is appearing to do, as they are not suggesting that, but rather complaining about the complexity of the project work. References:
Business Analysis Professional (CBAP) Certification Study Guide, page 131, section 4.2.3 Requirements Prioritization Prioritizing Requirements - IIBA How to Prioritize Requirements: Techniques, Tools, and Examples