Valid Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect dumps with Test Engine here:
Universal Containers requested to leverage Lightning Web Components (LWC) to improve support reps' user experience. LWC will be used as view layer, and Apex classes will have the business logic. Which attention points should the development team consider when implementing this solution?
Correct Answer: B
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
test - Nov 21, 2025
**Correct Answer: B**
### **Explanation**
When using Lightning Web Components (LWC) as the UI and Apex classes as the business logic layer, Apex code runs **in system mode by default**, meaning it *ignores record-level security*. This creates a risk of exposing data that the running user should not see.
Therefore, the development team must ensure that **Apex enforces record visibility**, either by:
* Using **`with sharing`** on Apex classes * Applying manual sharing checks as needed
This is exactly what **Option B** states.
---
### Why the other options are incorrect:
**A. “Use isSharesble, isEditable, and isCreatable to enforce field permissions.”**
* These method names are incorrect (typos). * Correct methods are `isAccessible`, `isCreateable`, `isUpdateable`, `isDeletable`. * Also, these enforce **field-level security**, not the key issue described in the scenario.
**C. “Create test classes including runAs…”**
* While good practice for testing sharing behavior, this is *not* the primary attention point for securing LWC + Apex interactions. * It doesn’t address the fundamental requirement to enforce record visibility in Apex.
---
✔ **Correct: B — Apex runs in system mode, so developers must explicitly enforce record-level access.**...
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
**Correct Answer: B**
### **Explanation**
When using Lightning Web Components (LWC) as the UI and Apex classes as the business logic layer, Apex code runs **in system mode by default**, meaning it *ignores record-level security*. This creates a risk of exposing data that the running user should not see.
Therefore, the development team must ensure that **Apex enforces record visibility**, either by:
* Using **`with sharing`** on Apex classes
* Applying manual sharing checks as needed
This is exactly what **Option B** states.
---
### Why the other options are incorrect:
**A. “Use isSharesble, isEditable, and isCreatable to enforce field permissions.”**
* These method names are incorrect (typos).
* Correct methods are `isAccessible`, `isCreateable`, `isUpdateable`, `isDeletable`.
* Also, these enforce **field-level security**, not the key issue described in the scenario.
**C. “Create test classes including runAs…”**
* While good practice for testing sharing behavior, this is *not* the primary attention point for securing LWC + Apex interactions.
* It doesn’t address the fundamental requirement to enforce record visibility in Apex.
---
✔ **Correct: B — Apex runs in system mode, so developers must explicitly enforce record-level access.**...