Valid Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect dumps with Test Engine here:
To grant Universal Containers sales managers access to shipment records properly, it was necessary to leverage Apex managed sharing. The IT team is worried about improper access to records. What should an architect recommend to mitigate this risk?
Correct Answer: C
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
test - Dec 02, 2025
**Correct Answer: C. Use `runAs` system method in test classes to test using different users and profiles.**
---
### **Explanation**
When using **Apex Managed Sharing**, Salesforce does **not** automatically enforce CRUD/FLS or record-level access in Apex. Because of this, architects must ensure that sharing logic is implemented correctly and that improper access cannot occur.
The **best way to mitigate risk** is to **thoroughly test sharing behaviors using different users, roles, and profiles**, which is exactly what `System.runAs()` enables.
`runAs` allows your test methods to simulate operations as different types of users, so you can validate:
* Whether sharing is applied as expected * Whether users (in this case, sales managers) receive only the intended access * That unauthorized users **cannot** see or modify shipment records
This ensures the Apex managed sharing logic behaves correctly in all scenarios.
---
### **Why not the others?**
#### **A. `with sharing` (not “isSharesble”)**
There *is* a `with sharing` keyword, but there is **no keyword called `isSharesble`** in Apex. Also, **class sharing keywords do not apply to the Apex Managed Sharing logic you write**—they only govern SOQL row visibility, not programmatic sharing.
#### **B. `isAccessible`**
`Schema.sObjectField.isAccessible()` checks **field-level security**, not **record-level sharing**. It does not prevent improper access to the records themselves.
---
### ✔️ Recommended choice:
**C. Use `runAs` system method in test classes to test using different users and profiles.**...
PhatQL - Aug 01, 2025
B. Use isAccesible keyword in Apex classes to assure record visibility will be followed.
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
**Correct Answer: C. Use `runAs` system method in test classes to test using different users and profiles.**
---
### **Explanation**
When using **Apex Managed Sharing**, Salesforce does **not** automatically enforce CRUD/FLS or record-level access in Apex. Because of this, architects must ensure that sharing logic is implemented correctly and that improper access cannot occur.
The **best way to mitigate risk** is to **thoroughly test sharing behaviors using different users, roles, and profiles**, which is exactly what `System.runAs()` enables.
`runAs` allows your test methods to simulate operations as different types of users, so you can validate:
* Whether sharing is applied as expected
* Whether users (in this case, sales managers) receive only the intended access
* That unauthorized users **cannot** see or modify shipment records
This ensures the Apex managed sharing logic behaves correctly in all scenarios.
---
### **Why not the others?**
#### **A. `with sharing` (not “isSharesble”)**
There *is* a `with sharing` keyword, but there is **no keyword called `isSharesble`** in Apex.
Also, **class sharing keywords do not apply to the Apex Managed Sharing logic you write**—they only govern SOQL row visibility, not programmatic sharing.
#### **B. `isAccessible`**
`Schema.sObjectField.isAccessible()` checks **field-level security**, not **record-level sharing**.
It does not prevent improper access to the records themselves.
---
### ✔️ Recommended choice:
**C. Use `runAs` system method in test classes to test using different users and profiles.**...
B. Use isAccesible keyword in Apex classes to assure record visibility will be followed.