A project manager would like to add external engineers to the current team. Engineers will participate in specific tasks only during the testing phase. Which of the following contracts would the project manager most likely use in this situation?
Correct Answer: A
A time and materials (T&M) contract is the best fit when you need temporary, specialized resources for a limited period (here, only during the testing phase) and the exact effort/hours are not fully predictable. With T&M, the buyer pays for the actual labor time (often at an agreed hourly/daily rate) and any approved materials/expenses. This aligns to CompTIA Project+ procurement objectives around selecting appropriate contract considerations and types, where time and material is a standard option used when work is phase- specific or scope is not fully defined to a fixed deliverable.
By contrast, fixed-price is most appropriate when the scope and deliverables are clearly defined upfront (less suitable for staff augmentation). Cost-plus reimburses allowable costs plus a fee and is typically used for broader, less-defined deliverables-often creating higher buyer cost risk than T&M for a small, contained staffing need. A warranty is not a primary contract type for acquiring temporary engineers; it's usually a contract provision related to quality/defects after delivery.