Valid Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer dumps with Test Engine here:
Access Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Dumps Premium Version
(208 Q&As Dumps, 35%OFF Special Discount Code: freecram)
Exam Code: | Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer |
Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Designer |
Certification Provider: | Salesforce |
Free Question Number: | 78 |
Version: | v2020-08-19 |
Rating: | |
# of views: | 6685 |
# of Questions views: | 439197 |
Go To Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Questions |
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
Very good! I like the soft version which can simulate the real exam. They will all buy your Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer practice dumps!
No.# What does it actually mean: "User permissions and field-level permissions are applied for the new context". What "new context"?
No.# A and D is the right option
No.# I think the answer should be A,B.
According to the documentation we have to select the "No Access" option, if we want to share the selected price books with selected users. But here mentioned about some selected users but not selected price books.
No.# Ans. runAs + with sharing
IsShareable does not exist
isAccessible is used to test object/field access not the record visibility
Passed my Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam 2 days ago and I will buy another exam braindumps this time. Hope I can pass exam too.
No.# With Sharing is related to the others data. enforce sharing rule.
WITH SECURITY_ENFORCED is an soql statement it will not update anything.
innerclass is not related this context.
IsUpdateable correct because update is an DML statement and before dml we need to check isupdatetable.
No.# Should be A
If Privacy for a custom setting is Protected and the custom setting is contained in a managed package, the subscribing organization can’t edit the values or access them using Apex.
https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.apexcode.meta/apexcode/apex_customsettings.htm#
No.# A,B,C
The runAs method enforces record sharing. User permissions and field-level permissions are applied for the new context user as described in Enforcing Object and Field Permissions.
https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.apexcode.meta/apexcode/apex_testing_tools_runas.htm
Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam cram give me confidence to pass my exam and help me out, passed exam today.
No.# The level of access that the specified user or group has been granted for a share sObject. The name of the property is AccessLevel appended to the object name. For example, the property name for LeadShare object is LeadShareAccessLevel. Valid values are:
Edit
Read
All
Note
The All access level is an internal value and can’t be granted.
No.# It should be A, D.
No.# Sharing set not available in partner community.
So Answer should be A.
No.# B. is correct. Share
(Step 2: ) owned by members of sales managers roles in every country
( Step 3;) Share with sales managers' roles in every country
No.# @Mayank - You can. But it will grant access to every profile member, not only to a few key members. A permission set is the right choice here.
So: A.
No.# D. is correct.
https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.sharing_model_fields.htm&type=5
No.# B. Absolutely.
No.# Salesforce Shield Platform Data Encryption encrypts data in transit and at rest.
C is better ( non programmatic solution)
Just passed Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exams yesterday with good scores.Thanks freecram's good exam dumps -- all the questions are available!!!
No.# But you can set view all for opportunity at the profile level?