Valid Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer dumps with Test Engine here:
Access Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Dumps Premium Version
(208 Q&As Dumps, 35%OFF Special Discount Code: freecram)
Exam Code: | Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer |
Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Designer |
Certification Provider: | Salesforce |
Free Question Number: | 147 |
Version: | v2022-04-11 |
Rating: | |
# of views: | 9770 |
# of Questions views: | 381907 |
Go To Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Questions |
Enter your email address to download Salesforce.Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer.v2022-04-11.q147.pdf
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
The Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam dump contains a good set of questions. I passed my certification with it last month. It proved to be a helpful resource for clearing the Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam! Thank you so much!
No.# For me it's C.
We can only create lookups on master-detail relationships.
"A" doesn't seem ok because if the marketing team can access an account is because the account is, at least, readable. However, due to implicit sharing, the marketing team will also have access to its child, which is not supposed to.
B and D are talking about simple lookups. We can't create rollups based on simple lookups
No.# D is right. SOQL with security enforced can only check if the object and fields are not hidden from user permissions.
No.# D. With sharing will enforce record sharing while in this case create permission is missing for order object
No.# B is correct because you don't need to enable parallel sharing rule calculation, it done by default.
https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.securityImplGuide.meta/securityImplGuide/security_sharing_recalculating_parallel.htm
When you update organization-wide defaults or sharing rules, automatic sharing recalculation is processed asynchronously and in parallel.
No.# D : When a record's owner changes in Salesforce, any sharing entries associated with the record that were granted due to being owned by the original owner are removed. This is a standard behavior to ensure that only the relevant users have access to the record under the new owner. However, for records shared through Apex managed sharing, which provides a programmatic way to share records when the provided sharing model does not suffice, it's important to ensure continuity of access.
A Salesforce architect might recommend the following to ensure users don't lose access to a custom object record through Apex managed sharing when its owner is changed:
No.# Sharing rule don't work with lookup. So it's C
No.# @Oleg the requirements means sharing the records with internal Users that has Role of Customer Support. Sharing Group members can target Role/Public Group/Users so is the tool for the Job. D is correct.
No.# No, B y C are correct. I tried it in a list view.
No.# B and D are correct
**correction to earlier comment**
I feel C is incorrect because isAccessible is NOT a keyword in ApexClass where its a method in DescribeSObjectResult class
No.# B and D are correct
C is incorrect because isAccessible is used to check field accessibility not the record accessibility
I love these Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam questions.I have Passed Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam successfully. my friends want to buy the Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam dumps too! I have told them it is from freecram!
Thank you so much,the inforamtion from Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam dumps are very on-point.The questions & answers are really informative, and i have passed the actual exam with ease.
I have failed the Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam one time, and I passed it by using Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam braindumps.
Thank you so much team freecram for developing the exam questions and answers file . Passed my Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam in the first attempt. Exam answers file is highly recommended by me.
No.# B and D
From SF documentation:
"No Access - Users can’t see price books or add them to opportunities. Use this access level in your organization-wide default if you want only selected users to access selected price books. Then, manually share the appropriate price books with the appropriate users."
No.# A seems to be correct if we take into account that "A subset of employees should also be able to see leads." is another group of users in the org, which means that there are users who SHOULD NOT have access to Leads, by that logic the OWD should be private and then we open up access with sharing rules.
But I agree, the question is missing full context so it's hard to know what is correct
No.# "Universal Containers (UC) has a partner community for its 200 distributors. UC customer accounts are assigned an individual distributor. The organization-wide default setting for the custom Delivery object is private.
How can an architect advise UC to grant all users at a distributor access to delivery records for all customers assigned to a particular distributor?" - full question
seems like a sharing set would be correct - C
I pass my exam today, with a score of 92%. You guys can trust this is real!
I scored 92%
Good Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam, All questions are the latest.