You are developing a Snowflake Native Application and need to track changes made to the application code across different versions. You want to leverage Snowflake's built-in capabilities for version control and auditing. Which of the following approaches is the MOST suitable and efficient for achieving this?
Correct Answer: E
Option E is the most suitable and efficient solution. Combining Snowflake's Information Schema views with Time Travel provides a comprehensive and native way to track changes to application code objects. The Information Schema provides metadata about database objects, and Time Travel allows you to query historical versions of those objects. This approach leverages Snowflake's built-in capabilities without requiring external tools or manual change logging. Options A and B requires extra configuration of the whole process. Option C while feasible, Time Travel has to be enabled on each component, which makes option E superior. Option D is designed for data and not code auditing.