Valid DAA-C01 Dumps shared by EduDump.com for Helping Passing DAA-C01 Exam! EduDump.com now offer the newest DAA-C01 exam dumps, the EduDump.com DAA-C01 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest EduDump.com DAA-C01 dumps with Test Engine here:
You're developing a data quality process in Snowflake that relies on identifying duplicate records within a large table named 'TRANSACTIONS. You need to generate a hash value for each row based on several key columns ('transaction_id', 'customer_id' , amount', to efficiently compare rows and detect duplicates. However, some of these columns may contain NULL values, which you want to handle consistently during the hash generation. Which of the following approaches, utilizing Snowflake's system functions, will MOST reliably generate a consistent hash value for duplicate rows, even when some of the key columns contain NULLs? (Select TWO)
Correct Answer: B,E
Options B and E are the most reliable. Option B concatenates the value of the columns as a string to create a seed for SHA2, ensuring to convert the NULL to empty string, which is necessary so that SHA2 does not return NULL in the face of NULL column values. Option E also uses SHA2 to encrypt after concatenating all the column values but it casts all those columns to varchar, which is necessary for the data preparation and data ingestion as they might be of different datatype. The first option is wrong because Snowflake's HASH function automatically returns NULL if any of the input are NULL. Option C uses the 'II' operator to concatenate values and Snowflake will return NULL in case any value is null. Option D concatenates strings with a separator, handling NULLs implicitly by skipping them in concatenation, leading to inconsistencies