Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps with Test Engine here:
Generative AI Engineer at an electronics company just deployed a RAG application for customers to ask questions about products that the company carries. However, they received feedback that the RAG response often returns information about an irrelevant product. What can the engineer do to improve the relevance of the RAG's response?
Correct Answer: A
In a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, the key to providing relevant responses lies in the quality of the retrieved context. Here's why option A is the most appropriate solution: * Context Relevance:The RAG model generates answers based on retrieved documents or context. If the retrieved information is about an irrelevant product, it suggests that the retrieval step is failing to select the right context. The Generative AI Engineer must first assess the quality of what is being retrieved and ensure it is pertinent to the query. * Vector Search and Embedding Similarity:RAG typically uses vector search for retrieval, where embeddings of the query are matched against embeddings of product descriptions. Assessing the semantic similarity searchprocess ensures that the closest matches are actually relevant to the query. * Fine-tuning the Retrieval Process:By improving theretrieval quality, such as tuning the embeddings or adjusting the retrieval strategy, the system can return more accurate and relevant product information. * Why Other Options Are Less Suitable: * B (Caching FAQs): Caching can speed up responses for frequently asked questions but won't improve the relevance of the retrieved content for less frequent or new queries. * C (Use a Different LLM): Changing the LLM only affects the generation step, not the retrieval process, which is the core issue here. * D (Different Semantic Search Algorithm): This could help, but the first step is to evaluate the current retrieval context before replacing the search algorithm. Therefore, improving and assessing the quality of the retrieved context (option A) is the first step to fixing the issue of irrelevant product information.