Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps with Test Engine here:
A Generative AI Engineer is creating an agent-based LLM system for their favorite monster truck team. The system can answer text based questions about the monster truck team, lookup event dates via an API call, or query tables on the team's latest standings. How could the Generative AI Engineer best design these capabilities into their system?
Correct Answer: B
In this scenario, the Generative AI Engineer needs to design a system that can handle different types of queries about the monster truck team. The queries may involve text-based information, API lookups for event dates, or table queries for standings. The best solution is to implement atool-based agent system. Here's how option B works, and why it's the most appropriate answer: * System Design Using Agent-Based Model:In modern agent-based LLM systems, you can design a system where the LLM (Large Language Model) acts as a central orchestrator. The model can "decide" which tools to use based on the query. These tools can include API calls, table lookups, or natural language searches. The system should contain asystem promptthat informs the LLM about the available tools. * System Prompt Listing Tools:By creating a well-craftedsystem prompt, the LLM knows which tools are at its disposal. For instance, one tool may query an external API for event dates, another might look up standings in a database, and a third may involve searching a vector database for general text-based information. Theagentwill be responsible for calling the appropriate tool depending on the query. * Agent Orchestration of Calls:The agent system is designed to execute a series of steps based on the incoming query. If a user asks for the next event date, the system will recognize this as a task that requires an API call. If the user asks about standings, the agent might query the appropriate table in the database. For text-based questions, it may call a search function over ingested data. The agent orchestrates this entire process, ensuring the LLM makes calls to the right resources dynamically. * Generative AI Tools and Context:This is a standard architecture for integrating multiple functionalities into a system where each query requires different actions. The core design in option B is efficient because it keeps the system modular and dynamic by leveraging tools rather than overloading the LLM with static information in a system prompt (like option D). * Why Other Options Are Less Suitable: * A (RAG Architecture): While relevant, simply ingesting PDFs into a vector store only helps with text-based retrieval. It wouldn't help with API lookups or table queries. * C (Conditional Logic with RAG/API/TABLE): Although this approach works, it relies heavily on manual text parsing and might introduce complexity when scaling the system. * D (System Prompt with Event Dates and Standings): Hardcoding dates and table information into a system prompt isn't scalable. As the standings or events change, the system would need constant updating, making it inefficient. By bundling multiple tools into a single agent-based system (as in option B), the Generative AI Engineer can best handle the diverse requirements of this system.