Valid SOL-C01 Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing SOL-C01 Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest SOL-C01 exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com SOL-C01 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com SOL-C01 dumps with Test Engine here:
You are designing a data warehouse in Snowflake and need to load data from various sources. You have a table named 'staging_customers' that contains raw customer data. You want to create a new table named 'customers' that contains cleansed and transformed data from the 'staging _ customers' table. You need to perform the following transformations: 1) Convert the 'customer name' to uppercase. 2) Remove leading and trailing spaces from the 'customer address'. 3) Handle potential duplicate records based on the 'customer id' by only inserting the latest record (assuming 'load_date' indicates the load timestamp). Which of the following approaches, using a combination of CTAS (CREATE TABLE AS SELECT) and other Snowflake features, is the MOST efficient and recommended way to achieve this?
Correct Answer: A
Option A is the MOST efficient and recommended approach- It combines CTAS with the 'QUALIFY clause and 'ROW NUMBER()' window function to perform the transformations and deduplication in a single step. The 'QUALIFY clause filters the results based on the row number within each partition (customer_id), ensuring that only the row with the highest 'load_date' is included. Using window functions within a CTAS statement is highly optimized in Snowflake. Option B is incorrect because 'GROUP BY with doesnt guarantee that all other columns will correspond to the record with the maximum load_date for that customer_id. Option C can unexpected results, as the subquery might return multiple maximum load dates for different customer IDs_ Option D only uses 'DISTINCT and 'ORDER BY , which does not correctly handle duplicate records and only sorts the end result Option E creates the table first, then attempts to delete duplicates, which is less efficient than doing it in a single CTAS statement.