Animplementation engineer has been provided with 4 different source files: 03m 16s
1. Twitter Ads
2. Creative Classification
3. Placement Classification
4, Campaign Category Classification
The main source is Twitter Ads (which includes various fields and KPIs), and the rest are classification files that connect to Twitter Ads and enrich different fields within it.
The connections between the files are described as follows:
1st Party Creative Classification
File structure/headers:

Creative ID - links back to Creative Key (Twitter Ads)
1st Party Placement Classification &
File structure/headers:

Category - links back to Campaign Category (Twitter Ads)
Which proposed solution meets the client's requirements for the above use case?
Correct Answer: A
For the given use case, where the Twitter Ads data stream needs to be enriched with classifications from three other sources, the correct implementation would involve creating links between the various fields across these files.
Option A is correct because it shows the correct usage of the fields from the classification files:
* "Creative ID" in the Creative Classification file is linked to the "Creative Key" in the Twitter Ads data, allowing for enrichment with creative details.
* "Placement ID" in the Placement Classification file is linked to a corresponding field in the Twitter Ads data, allowing for placement details to be added.
* "Category" in the Campaign Category Classification file is linked back to "Campaign Category" in the Twitter Ads data, thus enriching the campaign data with the correct categories.
This configuration correctly uses VLOOKUP to enrich the Twitter Ads data stream with additional details from the classification files, aligning with best practices for data integration and enrichment in Marketing Cloud Intelligence.