Valid PCAP-31-03 Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing PCAP-31-03 Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest PCAP-31-03 exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com PCAP-31-03 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com PCAP-31-03 dumps with Test Engine here:
What is the expected behavior of the following code?
Correct Answer: A
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
R Bess - Feb 28, 2025
Execution Flow:
Initial State: m is set to 0 globally
First Error: When foo() is called without parameters, it raises a TypeError (missing required argument) However, before that happens, the assert m!=0 statement is evaluated Since m is 0, this raises an AssertionError Exception Handling: The AssertionError is not an ArithmeticError, so it's caught by the second except clause This means m += 1 is executed first, making m = 1
Program Continues: After the first exception is caught, the code continues running The TypeError (missing argument) is also caught by the second except clause This means m += 1 is executed again, making m = 2
Finally, the AssertionError triggers one more time, adding 1 more to m This makes m = 3
Final Result The value of m becomes 3 because: First AssertionError: +1 TypeError from missing argument: +1 Second AssertionError: +1 Total: 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
Antonio - Nov 17, 2021
This code raise the assertion error so this code only handle Arithmetic error and the code enters in except branch and the final result is 1.
Atmane - May 24, 2021
Answer is erroneous: m=0 def foo(n): global m assert m!=0 try: return 1/n except ArithmeticError: raise ValueError try: foo() except ArithmeticError: m+=2 except: m+=1 print(m)
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
Execution Flow:
Initial State:
m is set to 0 globally
First Error:
When foo() is called without parameters, it raises a TypeError (missing required argument)
However, before that happens, the assert m!=0 statement is evaluated
Since m is 0, this raises an AssertionError
Exception Handling:
The AssertionError is not an ArithmeticError, so it's caught by the second except clause
This means m += 1 is executed first, making m = 1
Program Continues:
After the first exception is caught, the code continues running
The TypeError (missing argument) is also caught by the second except clause
This means m += 1 is executed again, making m = 2
Finally, the AssertionError triggers one more time, adding 1 more to m
This makes m = 3
Final Result
The value of m becomes 3 because:
First AssertionError: +1
TypeError from missing argument: +1
Second AssertionError: +1
Total: 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
This code raise the assertion error so this code only handle Arithmetic error and the code enters in except branch and the final result is 1.
Answer is erroneous:
m=0
def foo(n):
global m
assert m!=0
try:
return 1/n
except ArithmeticError:
raise ValueError
try:
foo()
except ArithmeticError:
m+=2
except:
m+=1
print(m)
print --> 1 on screen after execution