Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer dumps with Test Engine here:
Scenario 10: NetworkFuse develops, manufactures, and sells network hardware. The company has had an operational information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 for approximately two years. Recently, it has applied for a j^ombined certification audit in order to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001. After selecting the certification body, NetworkFuse prepared the employees for the audit The company decided to not conduct a self-evaluation before the audit since, according to the top management, it was not necessary. In addition, it ensured the availability of documented information, including internal audit reports and management reviews, technologies in place, and the general operations of the ISMS and the QMS. However, the company requested from the certification body that the documentation could not be carried off-site However, the audit was not performed within the scheduled days because NetworkFuse rejected the audit team leader assigned and requested their replacement The company asserted that the same audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to its main competitor, which, for the company's top management, was a potential conflict of interest. The request was not accepted by the certification body The certification body rejected NetworkFuse's request to change the audit team leader. Is this acceptable? Refer to scenario 10.
Correct Answer: B
According to the ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer course, the certification body is responsible for selecting and appointing the audit team members, taking into account the competence, impartiality, and objectivity of the auditors1. The auditee can request the replacement of an audit team member only if there is a valid reason to doubt their competence or impartiality, such as a personal or professional conflict of interest, a lack of relevant experience or qualifications, or a previous involvement in the auditee's activities2. However, NetworkFuse did not give a valid reason to support their claims, as the fact that the audit team leader issued a recommendation for certification to their main competitor does not imply a conflict of interest or a bias. Therefore, the certification body rejected NetworkFuse's request to change the audit team leader, which is acceptable.