Here,s why the other statements are not true:
A). A DRG can only peer with one LPG per VCN: This is false. A DRG can peer with multiple LPGs within the same VCN, allowing for connections to various on-premises networks or other peered VCNs.C. Both DRGs and LPGs enable direct transit routing between on-premises networks and OCI resources: This is partially true. DRGs enable transit routing, which allows resources within a VCN to access resources in other VCNs or on-premises networks through a central gateway. LPGs, on the other hand, facilitate local peering within the same VCN, directly connecting resources across subnets. They don,t inherently enable transit routing to external networks.D. Peering between a DRG and an LPG allows transitive routing only within the LPG,s VCN: This is false. When a DRG is peered with an LPG, resources in the LPG,s VCN can leverage the DRG,s transit routing capabilities to reach resources in other VCNs or on-premises networks connected to the DRG. It,s not limited to the LPG,s VCN itself.