Valid JN0-636 Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing JN0-636 Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest JN0-636 exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com JN0-636 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com JN0-636 dumps with Test Engine here:
Exhibit You are implementing filter-based forwarding to send traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network through ISP-1 while sending all other traffic through your connection to ISP-2. Your ge-0/0/1 interface connects to two networks, including the 172.25.0.0/24 network. You have implemented the configuration shown in the exhibit. The traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network is being forwarded as expected to 172.20.0.2, however traffic from the other network (172.25.1.0/24) is not being forwarded to the upstream 172.21.0.2 neighbor. In this scenario, which action will solve this problem?
Correct Answer: C
The exhibit shows the configuration of filter-based forwarding on an SRX Series device. Filter-based forwarding is a feature that allows the device to use firewall filters to direct traffic to different routing instances based on the match criteria. In this scenario, the device has two routing instances - ISP-1 and ISP-2 - and two firewall filters - FBF and FBF-ISP-1. The FBF filter is applied to the ge-0/0/1 interface as an input filter. The FBF filter has one term that matches the traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network and directs it to the ISP-1 routing instance. The ISP-1 routing instance has a static route to the next hop 172.20.0.2. The FBF-ISP-1 filter is applied to the ge-0/0/0 interface as an output filter. The FBF-ISP-1 filter has one term that matches the traffic to the 172.20.0.2 next hop and sets the forwarding class to expedited-forwarding. The problem in this scenario is that the traffic from the other network (172.25.1.0/24) is not being forwarded to the upstream 172.21.0.2 neighbor. This is because the FBF filter does not have a term that accepts the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network. The FBF filter only has one term that matches the traffic from the 172.25.0.0/24 network and directs it to the ISP-1 routing instance. The traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network does not match this term and is therefore discarded by the implicit deny action at the end of the filter. The traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network should be forwarded to the ISP-2 routing instance, which has a static default route to the next hop 172.21.0.2. To solve this problem, you must add another term to the FBF filter to accept the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network. This term should have the action accept, which means that the traffic will be forwarded according to the routing table of the master routing instance. The master routing instance has a static default route to the ISP-2 routing instance, which in turn has a static default route to the next hop 172.21.0.2. By adding this term, the traffic from the 172.25.1.0/24 network will be forwarded to the upstream 172.21.0.2 neighbor as expected. The configuration of the new term in the FBF filter could look something like this: [edit firewall family inet filter FBF] term 2 { from { source-address { 172.25.1.0/24; } } then { accept; } }