Valid CS0-003 Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing CS0-003 Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest CS0-003 exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com CS0-003 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com CS0-003 dumps with Test Engine here:
A security analyst recently used Arachni to perform a vulnerability assessment of a newly developed web application. The analyst is concerned about the following output: [+] XSS: In form input 'txtSearch' with action https://localhost/search.aspx [-] XSS: Analyzing response #1... [-] XSS: Analyzing response #2... [-] XSS: Analyzing response #3... [+] XSS: Response is tainted. Looking for proof of the vulnerability. Which of the following is the most likely reason for this vulnerability?
Correct Answer: B
The most likely reason for this vulnerability is B. The developer did not set proper cross-site scripting protections in the header. Cross-site scripting (XSS) is a type of web application vulnerability that allows an attacker to inject malicious code into a web page that is viewed by other users. XSS can be used to steal cookies, session tokens, credentials, or other sensitive information, or to perform actions on behalf of the victim1. One of the common ways to prevent XSS attacks is to set proper HTTP response headers that instruct the browser how to handle the content of the web page. For example, the Content-Type header can specify the MIME type and character encoding of the web page, which can help the browser avoid interpreting data as code. The X-XSS-Protection header can enable or disable the browser's built-in XSS filter, which can block or sanitize suspicious scripts. The Content-Security-Policy header can define a whitelist of sources and directives that control what resources and scripts can be loaded or executed on the web page2. According to the output of Arachni, a web application security scanner framework3, it detected an XSS vulnerability in the form input 'txtSearch' with action https://localhost/search.aspx. This means that Arachni was able to inject a malicious script into the input field and observe its execution in the response. This indicates that the developer did not set proper cross-site scripting protections in the header of search.aspx, which allowed Arachni to bypass the browser's default security mechanisms and execute arbitrary code on the web page.