The correct answer isDbecause the API source inspection approach makes a clear distinction between the responsibilities of thesupplier, thesource inspector, and thepurchaser. The source inspector is not the design authority and does not have the authority to approve engineering changes that may affect cost, delivery, performance, code compliance, or quality. When a vendor proposes a change during manufacturing, the proper action is to ensure that the proposed deviation or revision isformally documented in writingand submitted to thepurchaser for review and disposition.
This preserves document control, traceability, and contractual accountability. It also ensures that any effect on drawings, datasheets, inspection plans, certifications, testing requirements, and final acceptance is evaluated by the party with approval authority. Option A is incomplete because it implies the change may already have been made. Options B and C are incorrect because the inspector does not perform or approve cost-benefit justification for design changes. The inspector's role is to identify, document, report, and verify compliance with approved requirements, not to authorize modifications independently.