Valid Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer dumps with Test Engine here:
Access Sharing-and-Visibility-Designer Dumps Premium Version
(208 Q&As Dumps, 35%OFF Special Discount Code: freecram)
<< Prev Question Next Question >>
Question 17/72
Universal Containers (UC) has a custom Apex class that enforces a business process and updates opportunity field-level security permissions of read only certain user's profiles are being updated by their class.
How should the architect fix this problem?
How should the architect fix this problem?
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
B should be the preferred option as Field level security is in question. SECURYT_ENFORCED will report error and fail any updates in case any of the field does not have required permission.
If class was updating for user with field permission of readonly, then the class was running in SYSTEM context, in order to run it in the user context, "With sharing" should be used. So, A seems to be correct answer.
Option B is correct because SECURYT_ENFORCED worked with SOQL statement but here we will have to check FLS