Answer: C. Use the with sharing keyword.

This is the same idea as the Account search question you just asked. Apex runs in system mode by default and ignores the user’s record access. Declaring the class with sharing makes its queries return only records the logged-in user can access through ownership, roles, sharing rules and teams.

apex
public with sharing class RecordSearchController {
@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)
public static List<Account> search(String term) {
String key = '%' + term + '%';
return [SELECT Id, Name FROM Account WHERE Name LIKE :key];
}
}

The other options:

A. WITH SECURITY_ENFORCED: It enforces object and field-level security, not record-level sharing. It throws an exception if the user can’t read a field in the query, and a query with it still returns records the user shouldn’t see if the class runs without sharing. It is a good addition, but it doesn’t answer “records accessible to the user”.
B. inherited sharing: The class takes the sharing mode of whatever calls it. When it is the entry point from an LWC, it runs as with sharing by default, so it can work here. It depends on the caller, though, and it is not the explicit guarantee the question asks for.
D. without sharing: It ignores sharing rules and exposes every record....

I think answer is C as with sharing apply the record level security and With SECURITY_ENFORCED is for field level security

the answer is C

The answer could be C on this. Can anyone else verify?