Valid Identity-and-Access-Management-Architect Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing Identity-and-Access-Management-Architect Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest Identity-and-Access-Management-Architect exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com Identity-and-Access-Management-Architect exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com Identity-and-Access-Management-Architect dumps with Test Engine here:
A security architect is rolling out a new multi-factor authentication (MFA) mandate, where all employees must go through a secure authentication process before accessing Salesforce. There are multiple Identity Providers (IdP) in place and the architect is considering how the " Authentication Method Reference " " field (AMR) in the Login History can help. Which two considerations should the architect keep in mind? Choose 2 answers
Correct Answer: A,C
The AMR field in Salesforce Login History is meaningful only when the upstream identity provider includes authentication-method information in a way Salesforce can understand. Salesforce can surface AMR information from modern federation patterns, but the actual authentication methods must be asserted by the IdP. That is why architects need to think about protocol support and IdP implementation. The field is useful because it shows how the user authenticated upstream, for example whether MFA or another method was used. High-assurance session settings are related to policy enforcement, but they do not by themselves populate AMR. The key design point is that AMR is an observation of the IdP's authentication methods, not an independent Salesforce-generated fact. This is why options A, C work together as the correct solution.