Valid Analytics-Con-301 Dumps shared by EduDump.com for Helping Passing Analytics-Con-301 Exam! EduDump.com now offer the newest Analytics-Con-301 exam dumps, the EduDump.com Analytics-Con-301 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest EduDump.com Analytics-Con-301 dumps with Test Engine here:
A company uses an extract built from Custom SQL joining Claims and Members. Members have multiple records in both tables # causing data duplication, which results in inflated claim cost trends. Which approach meets performance and maintenance goals?
Correct Answer: A
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract: The problem: * Custom SQL joins two multi-row tables, causing# many-to-many duplication. * This artificially multiplies claim costs. * The extract becomes heavy and slow due to Custom SQL. Tableau's recommended solution: # Use Relationships in the Logical Layer # Instead of physical joins # Tableau resolves many-to-many issues automatically # Query is generated at the appropriate granularity to avoid duplication This is exactly Option A. Relationships allow the Claims facts to remain at the claim grain and Members to remain at the member grain. Tableau resolves aggregations correctly, preventing inflated values. Why the others are incorrect: B - Physical Join Would continue the same duplication problem because multi-row joins multiply rows. C - LODs Would require complex calculations and are error-prone. They do NOT fix the duplication in the underlying extract. D - Table Calculations Happen after Tableau aggregates the duplicated data - too late to fix the inflated baseline numbers. Thus, the only correct and modern solution is relationships. * Relationships documentation explaining resolution of many-to-many granularity issues. * Guidance recommending avoiding Custom SQL for performance reasons. * Logical Layer behavior preventing row-duplication errors.