<< Prev Question Next Question >>
Question 24/50
Consider the following situation:
A PRPC application is running within a 1.2 GB JVM (Java Virtual Machine). There is approximately 350 MB of free memory and garbage collector reclaims in average 32 MB of memory in the course of an hour.
The Rules Assembly count is 0 when a typical interaction executes in average 72.6 rules. The application CPU peaks periodically at 22% but otherwise runs in average around 12%.
The application is generating approximatively 30 database alerts per minute. The database CPU runs at an average of 75% peaking periodically at 96%. The alert log file does not report any byte warning with a 10 MB threshold defined.
Users are complaining about poor performance. Their interactions take in average 4.5 seconds.
Which of the following approaches is most appropriate to resolve this issue? (Choose One)
A PRPC application is running within a 1.2 GB JVM (Java Virtual Machine). There is approximately 350 MB of free memory and garbage collector reclaims in average 32 MB of memory in the course of an hour.
The Rules Assembly count is 0 when a typical interaction executes in average 72.6 rules. The application CPU peaks periodically at 22% but otherwise runs in average around 12%.
The application is generating approximatively 30 database alerts per minute. The database CPU runs at an average of 75% peaking periodically at 96%. The alert log file does not report any byte warning with a 10 MB threshold defined.
Users are complaining about poor performance. Their interactions take in average 4.5 seconds.
Which of the following approaches is most appropriate to resolve this issue? (Choose One)
