According to the Threat Intelligence section of the XSOAR Admin Guide, indicatorverdict resolutionuses two key rules:
* If multiple sources have different reliability levels, the verdict from the highest-reliability source wins.
* If multiple sources share the same reliability, XSOAR selects the "worst" (most severe) verdict among them.
Because both integrations have equal reliability (B - Usually reliable), XSOAR selects the more severe verdict. "Malicious" is more severe than "Benign," so the resulting indicator verdict will beMalicious.
However, indicatorfield valuesfollow a different rule:
When multiple sources share the same reliability score,the most recently updated source overwrites the indicator fields, except for the verdict field.
Integration B updated the indicator after Integration A, so its field values overwrite Integration A's fields. But its verdict does not override the malicious verdict because severity resolution rules take precedence.
Therefore, the correct combined logic yields:
* Verdict: Benign? No # Because Malicious is the highest severity.
* Other Fields: From the most recently updated feed # Integration B.
But the verdict is strictly the "worst" verdict, so:
Correct answer: C.