Valid MCPA-Level-1 Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing MCPA-Level-1 Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest MCPA-Level-1 exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com MCPA-Level-1 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com MCPA-Level-1 dumps with Test Engine here:
Several times a week, an API implementation shows several thousand requests per minute in an Anypoint Monitoring dashboard, Between these bursts, the dashboard shows between two and five requests per minute. The API implementation is running on Anypoint Runtime Fabric with two non-clustered replicas, reserved vCPU 1.0 and vCPU Limit 2.0. An API consumer has complained about slow response time, and the dashboard shows the 99 percentile is greater than 120 seconds at the time of the complaint. It also shows greater than 90% CPU usage during these time periods. In manual tests in the QA environment, the API consumer has consistently reproduced the slow response time and high CPU usage, and there were no other API requests at this time. In a brainstorming session, the engineering team has created several proposals to reduce the response time for requests. Which proposal should be pursued first?
Correct Answer: A
* Scenario Analysis: * The API implementation is experiencing high CPU usage (over 90%) during bursts of requests, which correlates with slow response times, as indicated by a 99th percentile response time greater than 120 seconds. * The API implementation is running on Anypoint Runtime Fabric with two non-clustered replicas and has a reserved vCPU of 1.0 and a vCPU limit of 2.0. * The high CPU usage during bursts suggests that the current resources may not be sufficient to handle peak loads. * Evaluating the Options: * Option A (Correct Answer): Increasing the vCPU resources for each replica would provide more processing power to handle high traffic volumes, potentially reducing the response time during spikes. Since the CPU usage is consistently high during bursts, this option directly addresses the resource bottleneck. * Option B: Modifying the API client to split requests may reduce individual request load but could be complex to implement on the client side and may not fully address the high CPU issue. * Option C: Increasing the number of replicas could help distribute the load; however, with a high CPU load on each replica, adding more replicas without increasing CPU resources may not fully resolve the problem. * Option D: Throttling the client would reduce the number of requests, but this may not be acceptable if the client needs to maintain a high request rate. It also does not directly address the CPU limitations of the API implementation. * Conclusion: * Option A is the best choice as it addresses the root cause of high CPU usage by increasing the vCPU allocation, allowing the API to handle more requests efficiently. This should be pursued first before considering other options. Refer to MuleSoft's documentation on Runtime Fabric and vCPU resource allocation for more details on optimizing API performance in high-demand environments.