Valid JN0-664 Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing JN0-664 Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest JN0-664 exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com JN0-664 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com JN0-664 dumps with Test Engine here:
Click the Exhibit button. PE-1 and PE-2 are configured with LDP-signaled pseudowires to provide connectivity between CE-1 and CE-2. You notice no connectivity exists between CE-1 and CE-2. Referring to the exhibit, which two statements describe potential causes for this fault? (Choose two.)
Correct Answer: A,B
In the provided exhibit, PE-1 and PE-2 are configured with LDP-signaled pseudowires to provide Layer 2 connectivity between CE-1 and CE-2. The issue is that there is no connectivity between CE-1 and CE-2. Let's analyze the potential causes for this fault. 1. **LDP-Signaled Pseudowire (L2 Circuit) Configuration**: - Pseudowires in MPLS networks use LDP (Label Distribution Protocol) to signal the virtual circuit (VC) labels between PE routers. - For successful connectivity, the VC ID (Virtual Circuit Identifier) and LSPs (Label Switched Paths) between the PE routers must be correctly configured and operational. 2. **Analysis of the Exhibit**: - The output shows the status of the L2 circuit connection on PE-1. - The status (St) for the interface is `rmt Dn`, which indicates that the remote site (PE-2) is down or unreachable. 3. **Potential Causes**: - **A. The VC IDs are mismatched**: - Correct. If the VC IDs configured on PE-1 and PE-2 do not match, the L2 circuit cannot be established. Mismatched VC IDs prevent the pseudowire from forming correctly. - **B. There is no LSP configured from PE-1 to PE-2**: - Correct. LSPs are required for MPLS forwarding. If there is no LSP from PE-1 to PE-2, the LDP session cannot establish a path for the pseudowire. This results in the pseudowire being down. - **C. Interface ge-0/0/0 on PE-1 is down**: - Incorrect. The interface status is shown as `Up`, meaning the physical interface is operational. - **D. There is no LSP configured from PE-2 to PE-1**: - While this might seem like a potential issue, the specific problem of the remote site being down (`rmt Dn`) typically relates more directly to the forward path from PE-1 to PE-2 (i.e., no LSP from PE-1 to PE-2). Hence, the more accurate immediate cause is covered in Option B. **Conclusion**: Given the analysis, the correct statements describing potential causes for the fault are: **A. The VC IDs are mismatched.** **B. There is no LSP configured from PE-1 to PE-2.** **References**: - Juniper Networks Documentation on L2 Circuits: [Configuring Layer 2 Circuits](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/task/configuration/layer-2-circuits-configur - MPLS Configuration Guide: [Juniper MPLS Configuration](https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/mpls-overview.html)