View the exhibit, which contains the partial output of an IKE real-time debug, and then answer the question below.
ike 0: comes 10.0.0.2:500->10.0.0.1:500, ifindex=7....
ike 0: IKEv1 exchange=Aggressive id=baf47d0988e9237f/2f405ef3952f6fda len=430 ike 0: in
BAF47D0988E9237F2F405EF3952F6FDA0110040000000000000001AE0400003C000000010000000
1 000000300101000
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: initiator: aggressive mode get 1st response...
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: VID RFC 3947 4A131c81070358455C5728F20E95452F
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: VID DPD AFCAD71368A1F1C96B8696FC77570100
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: VID FORTIGATE 8299031757A36082C6A621DE000502D7
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: peer is FortiGate/Fortios (v5 b727)
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: VID FRAGMENTATION 4048B7D56EBCE88525E7DE7F00D6C2D3
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: VID FRAGMENTATION 4048B7D56EBCE88525E7DE7F00D6C2D3C0000000 ike 0:RemoteSite:4: received peer identifier FQDN 'remore'
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: negotiation result
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: proposal id = 1:
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: protocol id = ISAKMP:
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: trans_id = KEY_IKE.
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: encapsulation = IKE/none
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: type=OAKLEY_ENCRYPT_ALG, val=AES_CBC, key -len=128 ike 0:RemoteSite:4: type=OAKLEY_HASH_ALG, val=SHA.
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: type-AUTH_METHOD, val=PRESHARED_KEY.
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: type=OAKLEY_GROUP, val=MODP1024.
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: ISAKMP SA lifetime=86400
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: ISAKMP SA baf47d0988e9237f/2f405ef3952f6fda key 16:
B25B6C9384D8BDB24E3DA3DC90CF5E73
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: PSK authentication succeeded
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: authentication OK
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: add INITIAL-CONTACT
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: enc
BAF47D0988E9237F405EF3952F6FDA081004010000000000000080140000181F2E48BFD8E9D603F ike 0:RemoteSite:4: out
BAF47D0988E9237F405EF3952F6FDA08100401000000000000008C2E3FC9BA061816A396F009A12 ike 0:RemoteSite:4: sent IKE msg (agg_i2send): 10.0.0.1:500-10.0.0.2:500, len=140, id=baf47d0988e9237f/2
ike 0:RemoteSite:4: established IKE SA baf47d0988e9237f/2f405ef3952f6fda Which statements about this debug output are correct? (Choose two.)