Home
Cisco
Cisco AppDynamics Professional Implementer
Cisco.500-430.v2024-07-01.q25
Question 21
Valid 500-430 Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing 500-430 Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest 500-430 exam dumps , the ExamDiscuss.com 500-430 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com 500-430 dumps with Test Engine here:
Access 500-430 Dumps Premium Version (52 Q&As Dumps, 35%OFF Special Discount Code: freecram )
What is the minimum recommended number of nodes for a redundant Events Service?
Correct Answer: C
Explanation According to the Cisco AppDynamics Professional Implementer (CAPI) documents, the minimum recommended number of nodes for a redundant Events Service is three ©. The Events Service is a distributed database that stores and processes the analytics data collected by the AppDynamics platform. The Events Service cluster consists of multiple nodes that share the data load and provide fault tolerance and high availability. The minimum number of nodes for a functional Events Service cluster is one, but this is not recommended for production environments, as it does not provide any redundancy or resilience. The minimum number of nodes for a redundant Events Service cluster is three, as this allows the cluster to tolerate the failure of one node without losing any data or availability. The recommended number of nodes for a redundant Events Service cluster is five or more, as this provides better performance and scalability12. The incorrect options are: 1 (A): This is not a valid option because a single-node Events Service cluster does not provide any redundancy or resilience. If the node fails, the cluster becomes unavailable and the data is lost. A single-node Events Service cluster is only suitable for testing or development purposes, not for production environments12. 2 (B): This is not a valid option because a two-node Events Service cluster does not provide sufficient redundancy or resilience. If one node fails, the cluster becomes unstable and may lose data or availability. A two-node Events Service cluster is not recommended for production environments12. 4 (D): This is not a valid option because a four-node Events Service cluster is not optimal for redundancy or resilience. A four-node Events Service cluster has an even number of nodes, which may cause a split-brain scenario, where the cluster is divided into two equal partitions that cannot communicate with each other. This may result in data inconsistency or unavailability. A four-node Events Service cluster can be improved by adding a fifth node to avoid the split-brain scenario12. References: 1: Events Service Deployment - AppDynamics 2: Events Service Requirements - AppDynamics
[×]
Download PDF File
Enter your email address to download Cisco.500-430.v2024-07-01.q25.pdf
© 2025 - Free Practice Exam Collection - Freecram | DMCA
Disclaimer:
Freecram doesn't offer Real GIAC Exam Questions. Freecram doesn't offer Real SAP Exam Questions. Freecram doesn't offer Real (ISC)² Exam Questions. Freecram doesn't offer Real CompTIA Exam Questions. Freecram doesn't offer Real Microsoft Exam Questions.
Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates.
Freecram material do not contain actual actual Oracle Exam Questions or material.
Microsoft®, Azure®, Windows®, Windows Vista®, and the Windows logo are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.
Freecram Materials do not contain actual questions and answers from Cisco's Certification Exams. The brand Cisco is a registered trademark of CISCO, Inc.
CFA Institute does not endorse, promote or warrant the accuracy or quality of these questions. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
Freecram does not offer exam dumps or questions from actual exams. We offer learning material and practice tests created by subject matter experts to assist and help learners prepare for those exams. All certification brands used on the website are owned by the respective brand owners. Freecram does not own or claim any ownership on any of the brands.