<< Prev Question

Question 21/21

The formal merger with Darrell has been negotiated and the legal formalities have been completed. The two company management teams are working on the integration of the two businesses.
You receive an email from Peter Sorchi, the Chief Executive of the merged company:
From: Peter Sorchi, Chief Executive Officer
To: Senior Finance Manager
Subject: Integration of IT and treasury
Hi,
I need you to advise me on a couple of matters. The attached press clipping shows how sensitive this is.
We need to integrate the IT and treasury functions of the former Wodd and Darrell. I thought that it would be a simple matter of identifying the common ground and slimming down both companies' departments to cover the new entity, but I have the heads of both IT and treasury from each company arguing that their approaches are better for the merged group and that they should take the lead.
Wodd's Treasurer claims to be an expert in natural hedging of currency risks and Darrell's argues that her department was highly successful because it makes excellent use of derivatives for hedging. Both agree only on the fact that they cannot work together. I am afraid that I have to agree with them on that and the Board will have the difficult decision of choosing between them.
I have the opposite problem with the IT function. The two Heads of IT are excited to be able to combine their databases and to develop their respective interests in Big Dat a. They claim that we should retain all of the professional staff in both departments and possibly even expand the merged IT Department beyond that. Given the rationalisation in all of our other functions, I do not think that we can agree to that, but I would hate to throw away a worthwhile opportunity.
Please give me your thoughts on the following:
* What approach to hedging is more likely to meet our needs: natural hedging or heavy use of derivatives?
* Ignoring hedging, what other factors should we consider in deciding between the two treasurers?
* Are the two heads of IT likely to be correct in arguing that we need to retain all existing IT staff in order to exploit synergies in data, particularly opportunities to leverage Big Data?
* What would the challenges be in motivating them to reduce their joint staffing levels and how might we deal with these?
Peter

LEAVE A REPLY

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Question List (21q)
Question 1: The following email has just arrived: From: William Seaton, ...
Question 2: A further eight weeks have passed since the discussion conce...
Question 3: Newsweb Wodd and Darrell announce plans for restructuring Tr...
Question 4: Reference Material: (Exhibit) You have received the followin...
Question 5: The Director of Finance, William Seaton, has stopped you in ...
Question 6: Twelve hours have passed since you received the telephone ca...
Question 7: From: Martin Wills, Head Geologist To: William Seaton, Direc...
Question 8: A month has passed since you submitted the report requested ...
Question 9: Peter Sorchi, Wodd's Chief Executive has stopped you in the ...
Question 10: Newsweb Protesters block bulldozers Attempts by Wodd to harv...
Question 11: Reference Material: (Exhibit) Wodd's Chief Executive, Peter ...
Question 12: Daily Gazette Draft story for comment The singer, the forest...
Question 13: Daily Gazette Celebrities flock to release tax returns Comed...
Question 14: The Director of Finance, William Seaton, has invited you int...
Question 15: SIMULATION A month later, you receive the following email: (...
Question 16: From: Abdhulla Al- Waihabi, Regional Manager - Middle East -...
Question 17: Memorandum of Understanding between Fouce Oil and Slide It i...
Question 18: Six months have passed since you briefed William Seaton, Dir...
Question 19: Three months has passed since the discussion concerning Fouc...
Question 20: You have received the following email from Peter Sorchi, CEO...
Question 21: The formal merger with Darrell has been negotiated and the l...