The correct answer is B (False) because, while CCPS strongly emphasizes the importance of periodic review of operating procedures , it does not require that the review be performed by the original author . In fact, CCPS Risk-Based Process Safety encourages independent, multidisciplinary review to improve effectiveness and identify gaps.
Operating procedures should be reviewed regularly to ensure they remain accurate, current, and aligned with actual plant conditions , especially after changes managed through MOC. However, limiting the review to the original author can introduce bias and reduce the likelihood of identifying errors or outdated information.
CCPS promotes involving operators, engineers, supervisors, and subject matter experts in the review process.
Operators, in particular, provide valuable practical insights into how procedures are used in real operations.
Independent reviewers are more likely to challenge assumptions and detect inconsistencies.
Additionally, procedure reviews should verify consistency with process safety information, training materials, and field practices . This supports safe and reliable operations and reduces the risk of human error.
Therefore, while periodic review is essential, requiring the original author to perform the review is not considered good RBPS practice , and broader participation is preferred.