Valid PDI Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing PDI Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest PDI exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com PDI exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com PDI dumps with Test Engine here:
Access PDI Dumps Premium Version
(205 Q&As Dumps, 35%OFF Special Discount Code: freecram)
Exam Code: | PDI |
Exam Name: | Platform Developer I (PDI) |
Certification Provider: | Salesforce |
Free Question Number: | 88 |
Version: | v2022-08-06 |
Rating: | |
# of views: | 5990 |
# of Questions views: | 266498 |
Go To PDI Questions |
Recent Comments (The most recent comments are at the top.)
Thank you so much!
Hi, feedback from Alex: I got 95% on my PDI exam.
Passing PDI exam is hard for me, I happen to know PDI study materials from others, I decide to try it. The result is that PDI study materials are very effictive.
No.# 100% it's C & D
C. To delete 15,000 inactive Accounts In a single transaction after a deployment
D. To run a batch Apex class to update all Contacts
No.# B , D , E
No.# Answer is A , since we cannot caught Governor related limits exceptions
No.# To share a specific Case_Defect__c record with a user, it's important to understand how sharing works in Salesforce, especially with junction objects.
A junction object (like Case_Defect__c in this scenario) typically inherits sharing settings from its parent objects. In this case, Case_Defect__c is related to both Case and Defect__c. To ensure the user has access to the Case_Defect__c record, they must have access to both parent records (the Case and the Defect__c).
So yeah , the correct answer is: B
No.# I think it's B and here is why :
A custom controller extension allows you to extend the functionality of the standard controller. You can use the standard save method and add custom logic to merge records as needed. This approach leverages both the built-in features of the standard controller and the flexibility of custom Apex code.
While a custom controller could also meet the requirement, it involves more work since you would need to implement all basic operations (like saving records) from scratch. Using a controller extension is more efficient as it builds on top of the standard controller.
No.# I think answer is D , here is why :
In a multi-tenant environment, tenants share the same computing resources, such as processing power, memory, and storage, provided by the host. This predefined access allows for efficient resource allocation and management without the need for each tenant to manage their own infrastructure.
No.# Sorry i wanted to write D , not C
No.# I think answer is B , here is why :
In a multi-tenant environment, tenants share the same computing resources, such as processing power, memory, and storage, provided by the host. This predefined access allows for efficient resource allocation and management without the need for each tenant to manage their own infrastructure.
No.# A is Correct ,
In this block of code, an insert statement is executed 500 times, which exceeds the limit of 150 DML statements per transaction. Consequently, a governor limit exception will be thrown once the limit is reached, and the transaction will be rolled back.
As a result, the number of accounts that will be successfully inserted is 0
No.# D is correct ,
If the user has access to the Order object will for sure have an access to its lines items , this is due to the nature of security acess inheritance on a master detail relashionship , so it can't be C
No.# Should be A
No.# Answer is A
No.# Answer is C :
https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.flow_pause_cmp.htm&type=5
No.# Since the question didnt mention that a component is a parent or a component is a child ,
to me seems like the respons would be :
A or D ===> 'D. Use Lightning Message Service to communicate between the components.'
Because the other options requires Parent to child relashionship
No.# Answer is A
No.# I think there is something wrong with this code , how can the variable that represent the current element on the list in a foreach loop holds the type ( List<Lead> ) and the list being looped on has the same type
I think the code is not correct
No.# C is the correct response
No.# Answer is A