Valid EGMP2201 Dumps shared by ExamDiscuss.com for Helping Passing EGMP2201 Exam! ExamDiscuss.com now offer the newest EGMP2201 exam dumps, the ExamDiscuss.com EGMP2201 exam questions have been updated and answers have been corrected get the newest ExamDiscuss.com EGMP2201 dumps with Test Engine here:
AGIS analyst who usesArcGIS Pro needs to reload data into a versioned feature class stored in a feature dataset. The feature class participates in a geodatabase topology. Which steps should the GIS analyst take?
Correct Answer: A
Understanding the Scenario: * The feature class is versioned and participates in a geodatabase topology. * The goal is to reload data while maintaining versioning and topology integrity. Key Considerations for Reloading Data: * Truncate Table:TheTruncate Tabletool efficiently deletes all rows in the feature class without logging individual row deletions in the geodatabase. It is the preferred method for clearing data while minimizing impact on performance. * Append Tool:After truncating the table, theAppendtool can load new data into the feature class, ensuring that the topology and versioning structure remain intact. * Avoiding Delete Rows:Deleting rows manually logs each deletion in delta tables, leading to a potential performance bottleneck and unnecessary transaction logging, especially for versioned datasets. * Geodatabase Topology Consideration:Topology rules will need to be validated after reloading the data to ensure spatial integrity. Steps to Reload Data: * Use theTruncate Tabletool to remove existing records. * Use theAppendtool to load the new data into the feature class. * Validate the topology in the geodatabase to check for any errors after the reload. References: * Esri Documentation: Truncate Table. * Loading Data into Versioned Feature Classes: Best practices for versioned and topology-aware datasets. Why the Correct Answer is A:Running theTruncate Tabletool ensures efficient data clearing, and using the Appendtool maintains the geodatabase's versioning and topology structure. Options B and C involve unnecessary row-level deletions, which are inefficient and could disrupt the versioned workflow.